Was it your intention to imply some sort of deep, metaphorical insight about yourself through the use of a rhetorically humourous warning in relation to an object that does not exist, or was it merely an unintenional oversight on your part and you de facto meant to provide an actual photographic object?
Or perhaps you are not, in all actuality, good enough to look at?
Pray do not take offense at the above question. It may or may not be true. Mayhaps it could be disproved of you would but post a picture, as seems to have been your original purpose.
Question everything. If you question nothing, you know nothing.